Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 06:56:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF5DFF788EF641627BCF5C6AC5D89BC87E7F89B9861D3A53ADC2228938F531C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court judged about the invasion of privacy, not about the fact that Brigitte would be a man or a woman.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767928860027306422
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF5DFF788EF641627BCF5C6AC5D89BC87E7F89B9861D3A53ADC2228938F531C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1710399365055
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767928860027306422BF5DFF788EF641627BCF5C6AC5D89BC87E7F89B9861D3A53ADC2228938F531C6