Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 01:23:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court judged about the invasion of privacy, not about the fact that Brigitte would be a man or a woman.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767928860027306422
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719365039109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767928860027306422935AD3D7FCAD2FDCE78D55B5335738AC51CC5F6A43D3C056DBA4F64ADD79C85C