Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 23:00:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D02EA02BDE7CEC9437D864FDE47DDF56F8D4975D6BB9A3CEB02C9D79068F343
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court judged about the invasion of privacy, not about the fact that Brigitte would be a man or a woman.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767928860027306422
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D02EA02BDE7CEC9437D864FDE47DDF56F8D4975D6BB9A3CEB02C9D79068F343
  • createdAtMillis - 1710370825058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17679288600273064227D02EA02BDE7CEC9437D864FDE47DDF56F8D4975D6BB9A3CEB02C9D79068F343