Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 20:18:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70CF57EBA548D1B0C4EBF29A9F857225F731DC45B6E1C5A2316BC6C50AB528BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court judged about the invasion of privacy, not about the fact that Brigitte would be a man or a woman.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767928860027306422
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 70CF57EBA548D1B0C4EBF29A9F857225F731DC45B6E1C5A2316BC6C50AB528BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1718050705813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176792886002730642270CF57EBA548D1B0C4EBF29A9F857225F731DC45B6E1C5A2316BC6C50AB528BC