Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 23:31:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 493D139299F9506A64B6D437A6D288DC34373ABBEE21D18061E974D4224FC297
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court judged about the invasion of privacy, not about the fact that Brigitte would be a man or a woman.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767928860027306422
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 493D139299F9506A64B6D437A6D288DC34373ABBEE21D18061E974D4224FC297
  • createdAtMillis - 1710372679948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767928860027306422493D139299F9506A64B6D437A6D288DC34373ABBEE21D18061E974D4224FC297