Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 04:05:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6550D603176A24CD6E0E5BAE9367FCCD5B2ED87DBBD11D42D5B7D35600989E31
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post discusses a court case that clarifies the application of the law, not the language of the law itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767927854375858537
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6550D603176A24CD6E0E5BAE9367FCCD5B2ED87DBBD11D42D5B7D35600989E31
  • createdAtMillis - 1710389109419
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17679278543758585376550D603176A24CD6E0E5BAE9367FCCD5B2ED87DBBD11D42D5B7D35600989E31