Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 14:04:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B6C312249073046B8923F8B9A1E2BD1CDF533617A120EB2D3DD2FDEB05EE920
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a distortion of the actual facts. There is much more to the Dutch Protocol being referenced here. "The intervention was justified by claims that it was reversible and that it was a tool for diagnosis, but these claims are increasingly implausible" https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article/20/3/398/7005631 https://segm.org/Dutch-protocol-debate-Netherlands https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-03960-001

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767904496611668257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B6C312249073046B8923F8B9A1E2BD1CDF533617A120EB2D3DD2FDEB05EE920
  • createdAtMillis - 1710338681403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17679044966116682579B6C312249073046B8923F8B9A1E2BD1CDF533617A120EB2D3DD2FDEB05EE920