Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 18:25:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a distortion of the actual facts. There is much more to the Dutch Protocol being referenced here. "The intervention was justified by claims that it was reversible and that it was a tool for diagnosis, but these claims are increasingly implausible" https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article/20/3/398/7005631 https://segm.org/Dutch-protocol-debate-Netherlands https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-03960-001

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767904496611668257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1710354337790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176790449661166825709C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4