Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 11:45:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDB571B0BB3D595F437150E1C7C5F3F5CD29207510FD024BD98166C95DFFA8F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The survey in question presents a sliding scale of agree to disagree With 65% strongly supporting the initiative and an additional 20% somewhat supporting it. To say 8 out of 10 "WANT" this is disingenuous https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5fec97c81c227637fcd788af/t/6402494ea778ea2e5ee2940f/1677871439437/OnlineHarms_V7.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1767746911556002093
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CDB571B0BB3D595F437150E1C7C5F3F5CD29207510FD024BD98166C95DFFA8F9
createdAtMillis - 1710330335638
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1767746911556002093CDB571B0BB3D595F437150E1C7C5F3F5CD29207510FD024BD98166C95DFFA8F9