Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 02:42:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81DDB4F4D4010A4DB8DCC0AF9107034BBE6F54C9A38EBEA38C7E1A18DFB8C260
Participant Details

Original Note:

There has been no article published to back up these claims. The articles in the New York Post relating to the photo editing, reportedly by The Princess of Wales, don’t mention Meghan Markle. There is no link to Kelvin Mackenzies claim. https://nypost.com/2024/03/12/entertainment/kate-middletons-photoshop-fail-cause-for-concern-worried-about-her/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1767707926091723252
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 81DDB4F4D4010A4DB8DCC0AF9107034BBE6F54C9A38EBEA38C7E1A18DFB8C260
createdAtMillis - 1710297769481
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 176770792609172325281DDB4F4D4010A4DB8DCC0AF9107034BBE6F54C9A38EBEA38C7E1A18DFB8C260