Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 06:45:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61FFA5142F0D64828E312AFEA6FA3FDDF7DD6DE333612E6B5D29AD554FE38AAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

There has been no article published to back up these claims. The articles in the New York Post relating to the photo editing, reportedly by The Princess of Wales, don’t mention Meghan Markle. There is no link to Kelvin Mackenzies claim. https://nypost.com/2024/03/12/entertainment/kate-middletons-photoshop-fail-cause-for-concern-worried-about-her/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1767707926091723252
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 61FFA5142F0D64828E312AFEA6FA3FDDF7DD6DE333612E6B5D29AD554FE38AAE
createdAtMillis - 1710312344848
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 176770792609172325261FFA5142F0D64828E312AFEA6FA3FDDF7DD6DE333612E6B5D29AD554FE38AAE