Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 01:05:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note is needed. This post is clearly a jab at OpenAI, reflective of his current disapproval of OpenAI’s efforts to be less open, prioritizing monetization over the initial values the organization had prior to levied investments from corporations like Microsoft.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767675423020679266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117
  • createdAtMillis - 1710291925331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767675423020679266C6B594878171C56A6A629429AC1F4C0AD84DC04DBF196A886AB7C1EB7B439117