Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-28 13:51:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D26A6C570DCB615AADD4347F4C3623A9A8544F16C5C96C9F574B536EE26EF3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note is needed. This post is clearly a jab at OpenAI, reflective of his current disapproval of OpenAI’s efforts to be less open, prioritizing monetization over the initial values the organization had prior to levied investments from corporations like Microsoft.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767675423020679266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D26A6C570DCB615AADD4347F4C3623A9A8544F16C5C96C9F574B536EE26EF3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1711633886349
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17676754230206792665D26A6C570DCB615AADD4347F4C3623A9A8544F16C5C96C9F574B536EE26EF3B