Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 16:28:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4637B8AD72FD8E8084D0A920585850DF0AE859B5F98021E2FA5DBE8A6EEB5EFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note is needed. This post is clearly a jab at OpenAI, reflective of his current disapproval of OpenAI’s efforts to be less open, prioritizing monetization over the initial values the organization had prior to levied investments from corporations like Microsoft.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767675423020679266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4637B8AD72FD8E8084D0A920585850DF0AE859B5F98021E2FA5DBE8A6EEB5EFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1710347283819
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17676754230206792664637B8AD72FD8E8084D0A920585850DF0AE859B5F98021E2FA5DBE8A6EEB5EFC