Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 07:39:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F4E686FEA2626B929B015D31E08E88C17F708A1D195321F9507E5B8DA099B18
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note is needed. This post is clearly a jab at OpenAI, reflective of his current disapproval of OpenAI’s efforts to be less open, prioritizing monetization over the initial values the organization had prior to levied investments from corporations like Microsoft.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767675423020679266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F4E686FEA2626B929B015D31E08E88C17F708A1D195321F9507E5B8DA099B18
  • createdAtMillis - 1710315554979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17676754230206792662F4E686FEA2626B929B015D31E08E88C17F708A1D195321F9507E5B8DA099B18