Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 06:19:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F809C7D43F4D558963CD83A3A6065ABA2B83FEED2C5EA47213BF9F2F2D2DB22
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note is needed. This post is clearly a jab at OpenAI, reflective of his current disapproval of OpenAI’s efforts to be less open, prioritizing monetization over the initial values the organization had prior to levied investments from corporations like Microsoft.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767675423020679266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F809C7D43F4D558963CD83A3A6065ABA2B83FEED2C5EA47213BF9F2F2D2DB22
  • createdAtMillis - 1710310743559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17676754230206792660F809C7D43F4D558963CD83A3A6065ABA2B83FEED2C5EA47213BF9F2F2D2DB22