Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 11:54:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA03D8EF6220FB4ADEE5C8152695E9DC65A33D3039B99ED7B0734B4FA05A39CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The comment is factually incorrect. The decision *was* based on evidence: https://segm.org/UK_HighCourt_Rules_PubertyBlockers_Experimental

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767667008538095816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA03D8EF6220FB4ADEE5C8152695E9DC65A33D3039B99ED7B0734B4FA05A39CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710330889406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1767667008538095816FA03D8EF6220FB4ADEE5C8152695E9DC65A33D3039B99ED7B0734B4FA05A39CA