Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 10:06:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E9BF4685431C46DB8ED444DD9EDC4DD9B2D9CC0F60CAC95F02517F82E204332
Participant Details

Original Note:

The comment is factually incorrect. The decision *was* based on evidence: https://segm.org/UK_HighCourt_Rules_PubertyBlockers_Experimental

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767667008538095816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E9BF4685431C46DB8ED444DD9EDC4DD9B2D9CC0F60CAC95F02517F82E204332
  • createdAtMillis - 1710324375151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17676670085380958168E9BF4685431C46DB8ED444DD9EDC4DD9B2D9CC0F60CAC95F02517F82E204332