Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 09:42:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53542269B0D7DF16A679264C8A8E0219331200BC5C1D2C2300F803D6330BB2A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The comment is factually incorrect. The decision *was* based on evidence: https://segm.org/UK_HighCourt_Rules_PubertyBlockers_Experimental

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767667008538095816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53542269B0D7DF16A679264C8A8E0219331200BC5C1D2C2300F803D6330BB2A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1710322973691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176766700853809581653542269B0D7DF16A679264C8A8E0219331200BC5C1D2C2300F803D6330BB2A3