Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 11:23:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Laut Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (9 S 20/23) handelt es sich bei "nur ein(em) Satz" um einen Grundrechtseingriff. https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/JURE245001537

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767656245580681685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1710415426836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767656245580681685FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7