Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 05:30:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC164A1D927915B3A7D7613A90434A5E00037CC68F200CD79D4474CC7CF80860
Participant Details

Original Note:

Laut Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (9 S 20/23) handelt es sich bei "nur ein(em) Satz" um einen Grundrechtseingriff. https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/JURE245001537

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767656245580681685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC164A1D927915B3A7D7613A90434A5E00037CC68F200CD79D4474CC7CF80860
  • createdAtMillis - 1710307817890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767656245580681685EC164A1D927915B3A7D7613A90434A5E00037CC68F200CD79D4474CC7CF80860