Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 18:08:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CAF0E746840A8A21D523C56DCC78FD74A7405A069C0C5E0C1B83590D1F45EA56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kollektive Anmerkungen sollen potenziell irreführenden Posts Kontext hinzufügen. Bei der Bewertung müssen sich Mitwirkende einig sein, die bei früheren CN unterschiedlicher Meinung waren. Wie im Artikel erwähnt, ist Missbrauch möglich, aber schwierig. [1] https://verfassungsblog.de/community-notes-auf-dem-prufstand/ [2] https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/de/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1767600559521948109
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CAF0E746840A8A21D523C56DCC78FD74A7405A069C0C5E0C1B83590D1F45EA56
createdAtMillis - 1710266910390
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1767600559521948109CAF0E746840A8A21D523C56DCC78FD74A7405A069C0C5E0C1B83590D1F45EA56