Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 18:21:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0A4FDC501A1E1B5C9DA6FEF7DA2B0FC42F22781F1A415E38694EA0EC9A040BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

El propio post trata de explicar que el City fue beneficiado en un partido en el que no participó (Tottenham v Liverpool). https://twitter.com/Mercado_Ingles/status/1767422531185635673?t=ebunhnDv_CPSPOS3x4pIdg&s=19 es una nota parcial al Liverpool completamente descontextualizada

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767500376113066412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0A4FDC501A1E1B5C9DA6FEF7DA2B0FC42F22781F1A415E38694EA0EC9A040BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1713637310060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767500376113066412D0A4FDC501A1E1B5C9DA6FEF7DA2B0FC42F22781F1A415E38694EA0EC9A040BB