Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 11:08:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA9125E6550BB84369C3F431F8E6C5A60AAD40A8DDD4C6DF8520F57E7A48F25E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Though controversial, the post does not state the terms did not exist. It says they where adapted to fit modern political concepts. Debatable. Does not merit a CN. https://academic.oup.com/jss/article-pdf/62/2/485/20658081/fgx028.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767489005484921257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA9125E6550BB84369C3F431F8E6C5A60AAD40A8DDD4C6DF8520F57E7A48F25E
  • createdAtMillis - 1710241713157
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767489005484921257AA9125E6550BB84369C3F431F8E6C5A60AAD40A8DDD4C6DF8520F57E7A48F25E