Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 21:04:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post vulnera la presunción de inocencia y da por ciertos unos delitos que no han sido verificados judicialmente. Tal como se explica en el enlace, no existe ninguna sentencia que permita afirmar que defraudó, sino una denuncia. https://www.eldiario.es/politica/pareja-ayuso-defraudo-350-951-euros-hacienda-trama-facturas-falsas-empresas-pantalla_1_11000023.amp.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767448440156402037
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710277472195
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767448440156402037450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A