Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 04:14:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F347C9855C45BA00B8233F6219DE2FB9EDD0F7C423A83969AF0C011D40230712
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kulldorff's story of his firing is multifactorial. The rejection of his exemption requests may have been motivated by Harvard's poor treatment of staff who opposed lockdowns and mandates. The proposed CN is thus speculative & incorrect.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767397844401651764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F347C9855C45BA00B8233F6219DE2FB9EDD0F7C423A83969AF0C011D40230712
  • createdAtMillis - 1710216887321
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767397844401651764F347C9855C45BA00B8233F6219DE2FB9EDD0F7C423A83969AF0C011D40230712