Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 04:06:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 845CFBA0B215419C9CC62C9285D3824D7692792B266558181E417C42CCB99C85
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kulldorff's story of his firing is multifactorial. The rejection of his exemption requests may have been motivated by Harvard's poor treatment of staff who opposed lockdowns and mandates. The proposed CN is thus speculative & incorrect.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767397844401651764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 845CFBA0B215419C9CC62C9285D3824D7692792B266558181E417C42CCB99C85
  • createdAtMillis - 1710216380194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767397844401651764845CFBA0B215419C9CC62C9285D3824D7692792B266558181E417C42CCB99C85