Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 15:01:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28C0D7A638A546082FBF1DE8BE87C16BBB71511D123366008F2C08526C46C578
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kulldorff's story of his firing is multifactorial. The rejection of his exemption requests may have been motivated by Harvard's poor treatment of staff who opposed lockdowns and mandates. The proposed CN is thus speculative & incorrect.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767397844401651764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28C0D7A638A546082FBF1DE8BE87C16BBB71511D123366008F2C08526C46C578
  • createdAtMillis - 1710255665451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176739784440165176428C0D7A638A546082FBF1DE8BE87C16BBB71511D123366008F2C08526C46C578