Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 17:10:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Kulldorff's story of his firing is multifactorial. The rejection of his exemption requests may have been motivated by Harvard's poor treatment of staff who opposed lockdowns and mandates. The proposed CN is thus speculative & incorrect.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767397844401651764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1710263413316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767397844401651764019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4