Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 22:58:08 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5296D652C40CEB7570F45BA781860F8A98D5D5CAAAEF0F302CE2BABA10CA8C4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Quel est l'intérêt vis a vis de ce tweet et de ce screenshot de préciser les règles de nomination et l'orientation prétendue de ses membres, a part défendre le RN comme le fait visiblement l'auteur de la note, en témoigne toutes les notes précédentes qu'il a pu faire ?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767274229215424866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5296D652C40CEB7570F45BA781860F8A98D5D5CAAAEF0F302CE2BABA10CA8C4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710197888522
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17672742292154248665296D652C40CEB7570F45BA781860F8A98D5D5CAAAEF0F302CE2BABA10CA8C4A