Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:02:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While the statement may not be true, there is no known evidence to dispute it. Additionally, anyone can download and use photoshop. If the photo was altered professionally, it’s unlikely so many obvious editing mistakes would have been easily visible. Debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767166955369157090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E
  • createdAtMillis - 1710162169189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767166955369157090F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E