Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:02:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While the statement may not be true, there is no known evidence to dispute it. Additionally, anyone can download and use photoshop. If the photo was altered professionally, it’s unlikely so many obvious editing mistakes would have been easily visible. Debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767166955369157090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004
  • createdAtMillis - 1710162162719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767166955369157090CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004