Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:07:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While the statement may not be true, there is no known evidence to dispute it. Additionally, anyone can download and use photoshop. If the photo was altered professionally, it’s unlikely so many obvious editing mistakes would have been easily visible. Debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767166955369157090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556
  • createdAtMillis - 1710162467782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767166955369157090AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556