Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 12:38:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27F94D40C58F3B083F2F27CA2814E1695D783086C0BBD4B40A1B44C813B34D19
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While the statement may not be true, there is no known evidence to dispute it. Additionally, anyone can download and use photoshop. If the photo was altered professionally, it’s unlikely so many obvious editing mistakes would have been easily visible. Debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767166955369157090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27F94D40C58F3B083F2F27CA2814E1695D783086C0BBD4B40A1B44C813B34D19
  • createdAtMillis - 1710160712471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176716695536915709027F94D40C58F3B083F2F27CA2814E1695D783086C0BBD4B40A1B44C813B34D19