Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 12:52:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BF3B1D8659D48D1FD9F476D8DAA9B81BADBCA24786D1F3C72A07AEE1F9E2EDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La Audiencia Nacional ya descartó lo declarado por Villarejo alegando que el testimonio del excomisario carecía de “precisión y verosimilitud”, además de basarse en “juicios de valor” y en una “recopilación de informaciones periodísticas”. https://maldita.es/malditobulo/20230118/11M-documentos-villarejo-rechazadas/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767159117364220200
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BF3B1D8659D48D1FD9F476D8DAA9B81BADBCA24786D1F3C72A07AEE1F9E2EDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1710161557891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17671591173642202006BF3B1D8659D48D1FD9F476D8DAA9B81BADBCA24786D1F3C72A07AEE1F9E2EDF