Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:57:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 137CFFF763A87957390BB88BFF3DA1428DF8A2439C62D191244B96964CFF1163
Participant Details

Original Note:

La Audiencia Nacional ya descartó lo declarado por Villarejo alegando que el testimonio del excomisario carecía de “precisión y verosimilitud”, además de basarse en “juicios de valor” y en una “recopilación de informaciones periodísticas”. https://maldita.es/malditobulo/20230118/11M-documentos-villarejo-rechazadas/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767159117364220200
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 137CFFF763A87957390BB88BFF3DA1428DF8A2439C62D191244B96964CFF1163
  • createdAtMillis - 1710165472983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767159117364220200137CFFF763A87957390BB88BFF3DA1428DF8A2439C62D191244B96964CFF1163