Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:46:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1E6A9F7384B29C9446B904923573884B9B11F54268A46DA4F95948C2819DE43
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is an example of the rhetorical bias called "cherry picking". Taking one example to comfort your point of view is not a factual and global proof of the point you're defending. You cant prove your point with just one example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking#:~:text=Some%20scholars%20classify%20cherry%2Dpicking,even%20completely%20contrary%20to%20reality.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767133679606788586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1E6A9F7384B29C9446B904923573884B9B11F54268A46DA4F95948C2819DE43
  • createdAtMillis - 1710164812308
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767133679606788586F1E6A9F7384B29C9446B904923573884B9B11F54268A46DA4F95948C2819DE43