Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 16:24:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF2FDBB4361BFF58B5D909F5BED2894E7187DD686EB1A8D87CE3600A179FBCB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is an example of the rhetorical bias called "cherry picking". Taking one example to comfort your point of view is not a factual and global proof of the point you're defending. You cant prove your point with just one example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking#:~:text=Some%20scholars%20classify%20cherry%2Dpicking,even%20completely%20contrary%20to%20reality.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767133679606788586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF2FDBB4361BFF58B5D909F5BED2894E7187DD686EB1A8D87CE3600A179FBCB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1710174272455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767133679606788586EF2FDBB4361BFF58B5D909F5BED2894E7187DD686EB1A8D87CE3600A179FBCB3