Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 13:55:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C769457981390102C4469BAB8AA8AF51DB640E54531ECCF734EB363D27AA0694
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study suffers from serious data quality issues and is based on hastily applied Bayesian methods that are not appropriate for the types of data it's applied to. https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1767109804978278663

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767120985793204578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C769457981390102C4469BAB8AA8AF51DB640E54531ECCF734EB363D27AA0694
  • createdAtMillis - 1710165319441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767120985793204578C769457981390102C4469BAB8AA8AF51DB640E54531ECCF734EB363D27AA0694