Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 10:43:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A37CD3E714DF514E16FE4CA62F00042F6E54DF1CF0E853B58B726C7F9E27A98B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study suffers from serious data quality issues and is based on hastily applied Bayesian methods that are not appropriate for the types of data it's applied to. https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1767109804978278663

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767120985793204578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A37CD3E714DF514E16FE4CA62F00042F6E54DF1CF0E853B58B726C7F9E27A98B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710153827378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767120985793204578A37CD3E714DF514E16FE4CA62F00042F6E54DF1CF0E853B58B726C7F9E27A98B