Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-12 03:34:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A14437D286D4D1F2C5A489D49BC35B90FD37C8F48162363E77B167903E12581D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study suffers from serious data quality issues and is based on hastily applied Bayesian methods that are not appropriate for the types of data it's applied to. https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1767109804978278663

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767120985793204578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A14437D286D4D1F2C5A489D49BC35B90FD37C8F48162363E77B167903E12581D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710214466940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767120985793204578A14437D286D4D1F2C5A489D49BC35B90FD37C8F48162363E77B167903E12581D