Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 14:20:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5353205F7833AAC34F7006AAB1A3E4AA52881CEC125A8366930B97C93D14BF7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study suffers from serious data quality issues and is based on hastily applied Bayesian methods that are not appropriate for the types of data it's applied to. https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1767109804978278663

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767120985793204578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5353205F7833AAC34F7006AAB1A3E4AA52881CEC125A8366930B97C93D14BF7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1710166830696
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17671209857932045785353205F7833AAC34F7006AAB1A3E4AA52881CEC125A8366930B97C93D14BF7F