Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 00:56:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8B2F2E4111E665F064FC44B161A8BB0505509F824C8C6B2D7DD9745430ED7A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

La página 587 de la sentencia 65-2007 del juicio por el 11M contradice explícitamente esa teoría de la conspiración. Nadie ha presentado ningún recurso posterior referente a Zougam y el Tribunal supremo avaló esta sentencia en 2008. https://archive.org/details/20071031_Sentencia_65-2007/page/n585/mode/2up http://www.europeanrights.eu/public/sentenze/Sentenza_Attentati_di_Madrid.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1766961820206543202
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E8B2F2E4111E665F064FC44B161A8BB0505509F824C8C6B2D7DD9745430ED7A9
createdAtMillis - 1710118587858
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1766961820206543202E8B2F2E4111E665F064FC44B161A8BB0505509F824C8C6B2D7DD9745430ED7A9