Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-11 06:48:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E8899F7B83982C64D1C4707FD32AFC672FD5858353E9146C63F14C6F5220498
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce tweet omet de présenter les faits de cette faute qui est issue double frustration après une faute grossière contre Vinicius et faire croire qu’elle est semblable à celle contre Leipzig dans le but de prouver son point. Cela génère une interprétation fausse de la situation https://x.com/younesdh070/status/1766898788839342381?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766948084653687054
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E8899F7B83982C64D1C4707FD32AFC672FD5858353E9146C63F14C6F5220498
  • createdAtMillis - 1710139739123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17669480846536870548E8899F7B83982C64D1C4707FD32AFC672FD5858353E9146C63F14C6F5220498