Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 16:34:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69EED84D1BA4A8FBEDAE832EE293833D7C3A8766EE7E524B168C5B63D643E15A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case in question is from 40 years ago. Current NYT policy, however, still contains many methods by which the organization could omit books it considers undesirable. https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/methodology/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766863179458482622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69EED84D1BA4A8FBEDAE832EE293833D7C3A8766EE7E524B168C5B63D643E15A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710088473074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176686317945848262269EED84D1BA4A8FBEDAE832EE293833D7C3A8766EE7E524B168C5B63D643E15A