Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 20:27:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the posted note leads to the NYT own site detailing what's INCLUDED in their list, and how that data is compiled. They are still able to pick and choose and so it's still Editorial Content and not a comprehensive full list

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766842163302658295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
  • createdAtMillis - 1710102422625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1766842163302658295DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930