Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 15:06:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the posted note leads to the NYT own site detailing what's INCLUDED in their list, and how that data is compiled. They are still able to pick and choose and so it's still Editorial Content and not a comprehensive full list

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766842163302658295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1710083186426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1766842163302658295015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9