Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 16:29:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39FBE13D73FF8658F81A66A5ED73AFBFA9A0BD455D9225DBAD7939B966162BDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is from a 40 year old case. Current criteria is included here. https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/methodology/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766834142304489859
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39FBE13D73FF8658F81A66A5ED73AFBFA9A0BD455D9225DBAD7939B966162BDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1710088149666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176683414230448985939FBE13D73FF8658F81A66A5ED73AFBFA9A0BD455D9225DBAD7939B966162BDE