Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 15:06:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is from a 40 year old case. Current criteria is included here. https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/methodology/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766834142304489859
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1710083176468
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1766834142304489859015A0E815DC49FAC716B672BC3CBC15CDA46F994EFF3B67C0048296B5A62F0B9