Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 11:57:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0848F3208ED8B6CD52F377324E0A1874A61FF67B69C19B5A9BA37610CEBB760
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Daily Mail has been criticised for its unreliability, its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate scare stories, and for instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement. In February 2017, Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/wikipedia-editors-ban-daily-mail-source-citation-unreliable-mail-online-a7570856.html https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/wikipedia-daily-mail-generally-unreliable.html https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/05/19/daily-mail-jimmy-wales-fake-news-wikipedia-wikitribune.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766767662640623995
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0848F3208ED8B6CD52F377324E0A1874A61FF67B69C19B5A9BA37610CEBB760
  • createdAtMillis - 1710071855617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1766767662640623995C0848F3208ED8B6CD52F377324E0A1874A61FF67B69C19B5A9BA37610CEBB760